Why SQL Server 2005?

by Administrator 14. May 2009 03:32

The following discussion is my point of view, and although it no doubt differs from that of

others, the basis of the discussion holds true. SQL Server faces competition from other databases,

not only from other Microsoft products such as Microsoft Access and Microsoft Visual

FoxPro, but also from competitors like Oracle, Sybase, DB2, and Informix, to name a few.



Microsoft Access is found on a very large number of PCs. The fact that it is packaged with

some editions of Office and has been around for a number of years in different versions of

Office has helped make this database ubiquitous; however, a great number of people actually

do use the software. Unfortunately, it does have its limitations when it comes to scalability,

speed, and flexibility, but for many small, in-house systems, these areas of concern are not an

issue as such systems do not require major database functionality.

 

 

Now we come to the serious competition: Oracle and Sybase. Oracle is seen as perhaps the

market leader in the database community, and has an extremely large user base. There is no

denying it is a great product to work with, if somewhat more complex to install and administer

than SQL Server; it fits well with large companies that require large solutions. There are many

parts to Oracle, which make it a powerful tool, including scalability and performance. It also

provides flexibility in that you can add on tools as you need them, making Oracle more accommodating

in that area than SQL Server. For example, SQL Server 2005 forces you to install the

.NET Framework on your server whether you use the new .NET functionality or not. However,

Oracle isn’t as user friendly from a developer’s point of view in areas like its ad hoc SQL Query

tool and its XML and web technology tools, as well as in how you build up a complete database

solution; other drawbacks include its cost and the complexity involved in installing and running it

effectively. However, you will find that it is used extensively by web search engines, although

SQL Server could work just as effectively. With the new functionality in SQL Server 2005, Oracle

will be under pressure to expand its existing functionality to meet this challenge. SQL Server

has always been a one-purchase solution, such that (providing you buy the correct version)

tools that allow you to analyze your data or to copy data from one data source such as Excel

into SQL Server will all be “in the box.” With Oracle, on the other hand, for every additional

feature you want, you have to purchase more options.

 

Then there is Sybase. Yes, it is very much like SQL Server with one major exception: it has

no GUI front end. Sybase Adaptive Server Anywhere, which is mainly used for small installations,

does have a front end, but the top-of-the-range Sybase does not. To purists, there is no need for

one, as GUI front ends are for those who don’t know how to code in the first place—well, that’s

their argument, of course, but why use 60+ keystrokes when a point, click, and drag is all that is

required?

 

Sybase is also mainly found on Unix, although there is a Windows 2000 version around.

You can get to Sybase on a Unix machine via a Windows 2000/XP machine using tools to connect

to it, but you still need to use code purely to build your database solution. It is very fast and very

robust, and it is only rebooted about once, maybe twice, a year. Another thing about Sybase is

that it isn’t as command-and-feature rich as SQL Server. SQL Server has a more powerful

programming language and functionality that is more powerful than Sybase.

 

Each database has its own SQL syntax, although they all will have the same basic SQL syntax,

known as the ANSI-92 standard. This means that the syntax for retrieving data, and so on, is the

same from one database to another. However, each database has its own special syntax to

maintain it, and trying to use a feature from this SQL syntax in one database may not work, or

work differently, in another.

 

So SQL Server seems to be the best choice in the database market place, and in many

scenarios it is. It can be small enough for a handful of users, or large enough for the largest

corporations. It doesn’t need to cost as much as Oracle or Sybase, but does have the ability to

scale up and deal with terabytes of data without many concerns. As you will see, it is easy to

install, as it comes as one complete package for most of its functionality, with a simple install

to be performed for the remaining areas if required.

Now that you know the reasons behind choosing SQL Server, you need to know which

versions of SQL Server are out there to purchase, what market each version is aimed at, and

which version will be best for you, including which version can run on your machine.

Tags: ,

Add comment

  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading

 

My Quote :P

Each morning when I open my eyes I say to myself: I, not events, have the power to make me happy or unhappy today. I can choose which it shall be. Yesterday is dead, tomorrow hasn’t arrived yet. I have just one day, today, and I’m going to be happy in it.

Month List

Page List